Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. If you want video and live view, get the 240. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. At this point, Leica will probably keep video for its SL series. Overall, I really enjoyed the simplicity of using the 262 which comes very close to the M3 experience in my opinion. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. You can set minimum shutter speed either specifically, or based on the lens mounted. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Keep up the good words! A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? If not, get the 262. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. I missed his musings in AP. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. Source: DxOMark. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. Be the first. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Got a spare lottery ticket? The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. By The type of viewfinder that the camera has. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. We were using the Sony cameras for video, so as I often do, I was shooting stills with the Leica. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. . In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Thanks a lot for your replies. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. Menu. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. This page is currently only available in English. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. Read full post here: Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. To each his own. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. The body is pretty well weather sealed. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. Some cards are woefully slow. More humble pie for me! Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. Great pictures and very interesting. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Its back to the basics. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. The battery can be recharged and used over again. No fuss, just compose and shoot. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. . There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. As is the image quality of the M10. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! Everything is very tactile. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. Great article as always! In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. How important do you think live view will be for you? The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. Value for money, incredible quality. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. Clear editor. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. Help us by suggesting a value. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. has a removable battery. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. Privacy policy. Which is the better buy? If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. You cannot paste images directly. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Whats the best camera for around $2000? I did, yes I have an M10-P now. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. Find out more about 35mmc here. If not, moderators please delete this post. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. A M262 is a friendly camera. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. Thanks, James. This happens with the M240 from time to time. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Thank you for it. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. I will investigate that. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Leica M (Typ 262) The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. Has a built-in focus motor Leica M (Typ 262) As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. Just because something new release does not mean the M9 or even the M8 lost theirs. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. That said, I do miss the live view feature. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. p.s. Just experimenting, I took a bunch of photos of my mates Canon AE1 this was fun with a rangefinder; I could get used to this! Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. You have to ask yourself, . A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way.