NIA1: Acceptance to the Scheme. The response must be a maximum of 2 pages. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. 15 Customer reviews. This award enables researchers to develop flexible, creative and tailored approaches to increase the impact of their research by building new or developing existing partnerships locally and across the . The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Impact can take many forms over widely varying timescales. These criteria vary according to the scheme or funding opportunity that the application has been submitted to. For the New Investigator Award the proposal cover letter should describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. Awards & honorary positions 1992 Schermerhorn Award - International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote EPSRC New Investigator Award for Dr Meghan Halse. Find out more about eligibility for new investigator awards. CVs are not required for the principal or co-investigators. Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. support for full economic costs greater than 100,000. Your application must also include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDF documents to avoid errors. Date posted 2 March 2023. You are encouraged to read these principles and should familiarise yourself with the resources referenced in our trust research and innovation guidance, including for example the guidance on trusted research from the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI), in order to get the most out of international collaboration while protecting intellectual property, sensitive research and personal information. Capitalising on clusters of design excellence, Green Transition Ecosystems (GTEs) are large scale projects that focus on translating the best design-led research into real-world benefits. The applicant is not expected to predict the impact of their research in terms of value, reach or significance, and therefore assessors should not: Drawing upon what the applicant has said, reviewers should comment on: The extent to which each bullet point is addressed will depend on the nature of the research proposed. The applicant could present a programme where they are moving into a new discipline, or the programme could bring together expertise and approaches from different disciplines, and in partnership with external organisations. As with all EPSRC grants, applicants should request the appropriate suite of resources to carry out the proposed research. You are expected to work within the EPSRC framework for responsible innovation. The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. Customer Reviews. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. You are asked throughout to assess the application but be clear that this means the ideas, concepts and approaches contained therein, and not the specific form of the document itself. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should assess the project as written, noting that any changes that the project might require in the future, which arise from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be resolved as a post-award issue by UKRI if the project is successful. You will not be able to apply after this time. (project number 18244), the UK EPSRC New Investigator Award CodeCPS (EP/V043676/1), and the Horizon Europe EIC project SymAware (101070802). HONORS AND AWARDS . contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. Early career researcher collaborations for global development. EPSRC New Investigator Awards: Open to eligible researchers in any research area at any . Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. The questions raised and answers will be compiled into a frequently asked questions document, which will be published shortly after the webinar. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. EPSRC does not assess the presence or value of any matched funding provided by the university before making a funding decision. For more information see host organisation statement for New Investigator Award. You should use the cover letter to describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. The aim of this funding opportunity is to support early career researchers to initiate or . The research excellence of the proposal, making reference to: The ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: The effectiveness of the proposed planning and management and whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified, making reference to: Feedback will not be provided following the prioritisation panel meeting. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. Three written quotations are required for single items of equipment costing more than 138,000 and must accompany the proposal. There is no set way for answering questions on the form. EPSRC must receive your application by 18 January 2023 4:00pm UK time. Customer Reviews. hold a fixed-term contract that extends beyond the duration of the proposed research project, and the host research organisation is prepared to give you all the support normal for a permanent employee. For further information please see preparing new proposals in light of EPSRCs policy on resubmissions. There is no page limit, but the statement should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. seek to assess tangibility of deliverables, direct return on investment or detailed routes to exploitation impact is not synonymous with early exploitation. Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. Index Alphabetical listing by name. It will be sent electronically to at least three reviewers, including at least one nominated by you. You should hear the result of your application within 26 weeks of submission by your host organisation. Investigators must be academic employees (lecturer or equivalent) of an eligible organisation. Creating a Draft Proposal (ESRC example) Costing & Pricing and the Justification for Resources. We will award 80% of the full economic costs of the project, and your organisation must agree to find the balance. Fast and efficient. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . In that case you should identify those aspects that you are able to comment on, and then give your review on just those aspects. the applicant and wider teams ability to deliver the project through to the creation of impact. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. EPSRC has up to 5,000,000 to spend on the 2 funding routes of this funding opportunity, including: You may apply for up to 200,000 at 100% full economic costs with a duration of up to 2 years. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. The weighting between the remaining aspects will depend on the specific nature of the particular application. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. Your host organisations statement of support is important. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. cover letter optional attachment (mandatory for New Investigator Award), no page limit, not seen by peer review. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . Elegance of presentation is not, of itself, an assessment criterion for an EPSRC grant. Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE) in the . Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. The Functional Genomics Initiative Clusters funding opportunity has two stages. Overseas partners at universities, public sector research organisations or publicly funded research You should not use journal-based metrics, such as journal impact factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an investigators contributions, or to make funding decisions. Unless specified in the call or scheme guidance documentation, EPSRC does not require matched funding, either cash or in kind, to secure funding. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. . Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap which has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. NIA applicants are also encouraged to apply to become an EPSRC Peer Review College member. However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. This is a very strong application that fully meets all assessment criteria. EPSRC acknowledges that it is a challenge for applicants to determine the future impacts of COVID-19 while the pandemic continues to evolve. whether mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the planned activities have been built in. whether the applicant has identified potential stakeholders and stated the relevance and possible benefits to the stakeholders. Research grants are open to UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations, Public Sector Research Establishments and NHS bodies with research capacity. Particularly with the increased pressures of COVID-19, EPSRC would like to stress to assessors that any cash or in kind support from the university for a grant is regarded as a benefit to building partnerships but is not expected to equate to cash or its equivalent (for example, provision of studentships, secondments, training and access to equipment). Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. The additional information will be requested from you in late March 2023. Working within the project team for the EPSRC project "Linking formation mechanisms, nanostructure and function in metal oxide nanosheets using multimodal characterisation" (EP/W026937/1). F.D.G. Frequently asked questions and webinar questions (PDF, 420KB). You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. No closing dates apply to the scheme. We do not ask peer review to comment on eligibility. Projects should be self-contained and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. whether the proposal contains a clear vision, addresses a specific challenge or makes a step change in its field, the progress this programme will deliver beyond current state of the art, the intended outputs of the programme, for example, new ideas, tools, techniques, discoveries, and whether these are ambitious but realistic. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. Complete the intention to submit form on Smart Survey. You are asked to comment on the project plan and management arrangements, which should be proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity proposed. For example, controlled sequences of cells in droplets with varied volumes is desirable in multi-volume droplet digital polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for accurate detection of genetic information in cells. So nothing is missed, EPSRC recommends that you follow the Cost to the Proposal headings used in the application form. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. Americas. Your project should typically last one to three years and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. You can also request support for research activity related costs, including consumables, for UK researchers during any time spent overseas. Can be applied for without holding an academic position. Only a Ph.D. professional can handle such a comprehensive project as a dissertation. There is no page limit, but letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. You should explicitly consider the amount of time being allocated to the project by the applicant in this assessment. It is expected that part of the developmental aspect of a New Investigator Award will involve support from the university and, where possible, an assigned student. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. Total Price. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Posts responsible for: None. Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. Find out more about completing your application. Text in tables and figure labels not within embedded diagrams or pictures should be at least 11 point. support for postdoctoral research assistant time, a grant for equipment worth more than 20,000. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. Summary. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. The ESRC New Investigators Grant is a relatively new scheme for early career researchers who want to become a principal investigator (PI) and work on an independent piece of research. This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. Information provided as part of the intention to submit will not formally assessed. The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. Find out more about providing declarations of interest. Applicants are permitted to only be involved with 1 application for this funding opportunity. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project suitability guidance. In recent years, we have witnessed impressive developments in the mathematical modelling of complex physiological systems. You should note that your review will be sent back, unattributed, to the investigator, who will then be allowed the opportunity to comment on any factual errors and answer any specific queries you have raised. The recently funded EPSRC New Investigator Award project, led by Dr. Wei Tan from Queen Mary's Mechanics of Composite Materials Group (MCM), will create an intelligent . The international academic project partners must also have an integral role in the proposed work. This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. EPSRC assessment processes, including expert reviewing and panels, may acknowledge the impact of university contributions, but will not consider the level of matched university funding as a factor on which to base funding decisions. This will populate: council: EPSRC; document type: standard proposal; scheme: standard whether the proposal articulates a clear understanding of the context and needs of users: Does the proposed research programme consider how these needs will be met? covering letter describing how your experience and career history fit with the guidance on eligibility: not seen by peer review, no page limit. Senior Lecturer in Mathematics at the University of Portsmouth, currently holding an EPSRC New Investigator Award. Case for support. Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? If, in your judgement, it appears that the New Investigator Award is essentially to supplement the student project, this should be assigned a low score and treated as a flawed proposal. how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. EPSRC Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council : Start: 01-01-2022 / End: 31-12-2024 : Amount: 392,388: SEMS Division: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Design. Complex, multifaceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. the application is an invited resubmission. It might involve developing a commercial product or service, or creating a new technology, but it could also be about improved medical or healthcare, contributions to national planning or social policy or engaging the public in the outputs of research. Not all questions carry equal weighting. We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. Proposals are considered in competition with other NIAs at standard research prioritisation panels. This will enhance UKRIs ability to report on overseas funding to: It includes any costs incurred by organisations outside the UK, including: The Other-DI Costs document is to contain the following data in the description box in this exact format: Organisation; Country; Cost Category; Cost Description. National importance should also be a major consideration in making your assessment. This helps reviewers make informed judgements about whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed. Location White City Campus - Hybrid. The application should clearly demonstrate the methodology the applicants intend to use to attain their stated objectives, and you should comment on how clearly these are described, how appropriate they are for the planned activity, and their scientific or technical feasibility. New Investigator Awards cannot be used to provide support of any sort for a studentship. The New Investigator Award scheme will. Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas. Requests for resources should be clearly articulated in the justification of resources section of the grant application. Prospective applicants are invited to join a webinar on 16 November 2022 at 10:00am UK time. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . Before writing your application, look at some grant records on these pages to see what information would be in the public domain. call/type/mode: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants, case for support (8 pages, 2 on your track record and 6 on the scientific case). University support should not necessarily involve covering part of the cost of the grant but could include: provision of dedicated laboratory space (or equivalent); provision of materials, equipment or facility access; mentoring and professional guidance. Principal Investigator. New Investigator Award ESRC Secondary Data Analysis Initiative Open Call SAGES Large Proposal Challenge Fund (LPCF) . Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. British Geotechnical Association - Gold Medal for best paper of 2020 2020. International Young Geotechnical Engineer Conference Award, Engineers Ireland Aug 2009. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 October 2019: Ends: 30 September 2023: Value (): 280,530: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Catalysis & Applied Catalysis: Materials Characterisation: Materials Synthesis & Growth: . If, for any reason, you feel that you are not able to assess the application, please advise EPSRC accordingly. Speaker: Dirk Husmeier. Fewer quotes are acceptable if justification is provided in the justification of resources. Universities may wish to support applicants through allocation of a PhD student. Information on the portfolio is available through EPSRCs Grants on the Web (GoW). Some funding opportunities may have specific requirements, which will be described in the funding opportunity. The Adaptus Research Group The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. This is one of a number of options offered by EPSRC for researchers seeking to establish their career, including fellowships, managed calls, and responsive mode. Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. whether the proposal details potential outcomes and clearly identifies any potential impacts. . Sustainable bio-based materials and manufacture: feasibility study. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility.