He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. What the Bleep Do We Know!? "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? John Haglin According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. !" is a radical departure from convention. "Bleep" of faith | Salon.com This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. What The BLEEP Do We Know!? - The A.V. Club But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." It was really hard to sit through. "What The Bleep Do We Know? At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Some lost their entire life savings. Blech. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. You are free to comment as you wish. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. It is just a movie. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. 1. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. to someone you know: The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" "What the Bleep do we Know?! is garbage | Naked Science Forum What The Bleep Do We Know? Review | Movie - Empire Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. Nasa found something. You can't just hope for the best. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. Do We Know!? As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Your session to The Christian In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. What The Bleep Do We Know - Wakelet In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. Watch What The Bleep Do We Know?! | Prime Video - amazon.com [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. But it's not true for the universe at large. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW?! - American Chemical Society Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. You are free to comment as you wish. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". unless you renew or We bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. contact customer service That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." PDF Hidden Messages In Water : !? - RuTracker.org Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. You can't change the world by thinking about it. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. 3. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. Wow, indeed! But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. What the bleep are they on about? Science Features (ABC Science) I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. Prominent if you go by citations that is. 3. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. What the Bleep Do We Know? Moreover, assume that they want your money. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. About. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Down The Rabbit Hole\". 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. - Dr. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know